barristeradvice – Barrister Advice 0207 867 3744 BARRISTERADVICE.COM

Direct Access Barristers in London – Comprehensive Support for Individuals, Businesses, and Solicitors

Direct Access Barristers in London, such as those from Barrister Advice London, provide individuals, businesses, and solicitors with expert legal representation across various courts in London. Whether you’re looking for representation in a local county court, the High Court, or even the Supreme Court, Barrister Advice London can support you with legal advocacy, advice, and guidance through complex legal processes. Clients can directly access barristers without going through a solicitor, which can save time and reduce costs significantly. Here’s how these services benefit various legal needs, along with details on county court locations, advocacy in higher courts, and the legal helpline available to clients.

Advocacy Across All London Courts

Barrister Advice London offers expert advocacy and legal services in all London County Courts, including:

Central London County Court – Thomas More Building, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, WC2A 2LL
Clerkenwell and Shoreditch County Court – 29-41 Gee Street, London, EC1V 3RE
Wandsworth County Court – 76-78 Upper Richmond Road, London, SW15 2SU
Romford County Court – 2a Oaklands Avenue, Romford, Essex, RM1 4DP
Barnet Civil and Family Courts Centre – St Mary’s Court, Regents Park Road, London, N3 1BQ
Edmonton County Court – 59 Fore Street, London, N18 2TN
Kingston upon Thames County Court – St James Road, Kingston upon Thames, KT1 2AD
Croydon County Court – Altyre Road, Croydon, CR9 5AB
Uxbridge County Court – Civic Centre, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 1XG
West London Family Court – 1 Redan Place, London, W2 4SA
Willesden County Court – 9 Acton Lane, Harlesden, London, NW10 8AX

These courts handle a range of cases, including civil, family, and some criminal matters, and Barrister Advice London ensures professional advocacy in each, tailored to specific case needs.

Expertise in the High Court, Court of Appeal, and Supreme Court

For complex cases that require higher-level advocacy, Barrister Advice London’s direct access barristers can represent clients in the High Court, Court of Appeal, and even the Supreme Court. Advocacy at these levels demands extensive legal knowledge, meticulous preparation, and a deep understanding of court procedures. Barrister Advice London offers experienced representation in these senior courts for cases including but not limited to complex commercial litigation and family law appeals. High Court advocacy covers divisional cases like the Queen’s Bench, Family, and Chancery divisions, offering specialised expertise to meet clients’ precise legal requirements.

Legal Advice Helpline – 0207 867 3744

For individuals, businesses, and solicitors seeking immediate legal advice, Barrister Advice London operates a helpline at 0207 867 3744. This helpline is available from 7am to 11pm daily, including evenings and weekends, providing clients with easy access to qualified legal advice whenever they need it. Whether you’re navigating a legal issue outside of business hours or need guidance on urgent matters, the helpline is designed to provide quick, clear, and actionable legal assistance.

Contact Barrister Advice London Today

To get in touch with Barrister Advice London, fill out the contact form available on their website, or call the helpline at 0207 867 3744 for immediate support. This comprehensive access to expert legal advice and court representation in all London courts ensures that clients can navigate legal issues effectively and with confidence.

Barrister London :

Direct Access
Barristers

& how to instruct them

@BarristerLondon Instagram
0207 867 3744

www.BarristerLondon.co.uk

www.DirectAccessBarrister.org.uk

Twitter: @BarristerLondn

Go to

www.linktr.ee/BarristerLondon

for social media and professional links.

SECTION 1
THE TRADITIONAL BAR

Barristers in the United Kingdom have a long and
storied history. The origins of the role can be traced
back to the medieval period, when barristers served
as advisers to the monarch and represented
individuals in court. As the legal system evolved,
barristers came to specialize in advocacy and
represent clients in both criminal and civil trials.
In the early days, barristers were not required to
have any formal legal education and were often
trained through apprenticeships with established
practitioners.

However, in the 19th century, the Inns of Court – the
professional bodies that oversee the training and
qualifications of barristers – began to introduce
formal educational requirements.
The Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC) formerly
the BPC, was introduced in the 20th century which is
still a requirement to become a barrister. BPTC is a
one-year full-time , postgraduate course that
provides students with the skills and knowledge
they need to practice as a barrister.

Part of the evolution of the Bar resulted in
introducing Public Access Scheme (Direct Access) in
2004.

In the early part of the 20th century, the Bar and
the judiciary were almost exclusively composed of
men from upper-class backgrounds. However, over the
course of the century, the legal profession became
more diverse, with an increasing number of women
and individuals from working-class and other ethnic
backgrounds becoming barristers.

As the legal system and society have evolved, the
role of barristers has also evolved. In the past,
barristers were largely self-employed and worked
alone. Today, many barristers are employed by law
firms or chambers, and work as part of a team to
provide legal services to clients.
In the united kingdom, Barristers are still highly
respected legal professionals and have a distinctive
role in the court room. They have been the backbone
of United Kingdom legal system and they are
responsible for representing the client and conduct
the legal case in the court room.

In England and Wales, Barristers are independent
legal practitioners who specialise in advocating for
clients in court and providing expert legal advice.
They are regulated by the Bar Standards Board and
are trained to provide specialist legal advice and
representation to clients.

Barristers are usually instructed by Solicitors, who
are also qualified legal practitioners, but it is possible
for individuals to instruct a Barrister directly. This is
known as “direct access” or “public access” and allows
9

individuals to bypass the need to instruct a solicitor
and go directly to a Barrister for advice and
representation.

To instruct a Barrister for advice from a Barristers’
chambers, you can follow these steps:

Identify the area of law you need help with and find
a suitable Barrister. You can search for a Barrister
on BarristerLondon.co.uk or call 0207 867 3744.

After identifying the legal area concerned you will
be asked to email the relevant legal papers in one pdf
document relating to the matter so that they can be
assessed in order for a fee quote to be provided.

You will be asked in the email in a concise way to
explain your legal problem. You will be asked to
provide some details about your case and the
assistance you need.

The Barristers’ chambers will then assess your case
and determine whether they are able to help you. If
they are able to assist, they will provide you with a
quote for a Barrister for their services.

Once you have received the quote and agreed to the
terms, you can instruct the Barrister to provide you
with legal advice or represent you in court.

The Barrister will then provide you with the agreed
upon legal services, which may include advising you
on your legal options, drafting documents, or
representing you in court.

It’s important to note that Barristers are bound by
strict rules of professional conduct, and must ensure
that their work is of the highest standard. They are
also required to maintain a high level of
confidentiality when working with clients.

These are the main advantages of instructing a
Direct Access Barrister due their skill as specialist
advocates:

Can save time and money by bypassing the need to
instruct a solicitor.

Allows clients to have direct contact with a
Barrister and receive specialist legal advice.

Can provide expert representation in court.

Can offer flexibility in terms of location and
availability.

Allows clients to choose a Barrister with specific
expertise or experience in their area of law.

Can offer a more personalised service.

Can provide independent advice and representation.
16

Allows clients to receive advice and representation
on a wide range of legal issues.

Can offer representation at all levels of court, from
the Magistrates’ Court to the Supreme Court.

representation in a variety of legal matters,
including criminal, civil, and commercial cases.

Advice on legal strategy and tactics.

Can provide representation at mediations,
arbitrations, and other alternative dispute
resolution proceedings.

Drafting legal documents and correspondence.

Can provide representation in appeals and other
post-judgment proceedings.

Can offer representation in tribunals and other
specialist legal forums.

Can provide representation in high-stakes or complex
cases.

Advice on international legal issues.

Representation in regulatory and disciplinary
proceedings.

Legal research and analysis.

Travelling to different courts across the country to
represent clients.

Notes.

Typical Hearing

(Every hearing is different according to the law
applicable to the facts)

During the hearing, the Barrister uses their
experience, knowledge and skill to establishes the
necessary facts of the case and present the evidence
to the judge. They may also cross-examine any

witnesses called by the opposing party and make
arguments on behalf of the landlord.

If the Barrister is successful in their representation,
the judge may rule in favor of the landlord and grant
the possession order. If the case is not successful, the
Barrister may advise the landlord on their options
for appealing the decision or negotiating a
settlement if other parts of the matter remain
ongoing.

After the hearing, the Barrister debriefs the
landlord on the outcome of the case and provides any
necessary follow-up guidance. They may also assist
the landlord in enforcing the possession order if
necessary.

If the landlord decides to defend a business contract
debt claim, the Barrister may continue to represent
them in this matter. This may involve negotiating a
settlement with the opposing party, or representing
the landlord in court if the case goes to trial. The
25

Barrister will work to protect the landlord’s
interests and ensure that their rights are upheld
throughout the legal process.

Example:

The landlord and Barrister work together to
navigate the complexities of the legal system. The
Barrister provides guidance and representation to
the landlord as they face various challenges.

The Barrister works tirelessly to prepare for each
hearing and court appearance, carefully reviewing
all the necessary documents and evidence and
developing strategies to present the strongest
possible case on behalf of the landlord. They also
provide counsel and support to the landlord, helping
them to understand their legal options and make
informed decisions about their cases.

………

Despite facing numerous setbacks and challenges
along the way, the landlord and Barrister remain
committed to achieving a successful resolution to
both the possession case and the business contract
debt claim. Through their hard work and
determination, they are eventually able to achieve a
favorable outcome for the landlord.

As the matters comes to a close, the landlord is able
to reclaim their property and resolve their business
contract debt, thanks in large part to the skilled
representation and guidance of their trusted
Barrister. A Barrister will usual provide you with a
copy by email of their note and order made in the
hearing.

Section 2

The Bar

Barristers in the United Kingdom have a unique role
in the legal system. Unlike solicitors, who handle
administrative and legal tasks leading up to a trial,
barristers are trial advocates and specialize in
representing clients in court. They are also called
upon to provide specialist legal advice in complex or
high-profile cases. Barristers are trained to present
cases and arguments persuasively and effectively,
and they often have greater expertise in courtroom
procedures and rules of evidence than solicitors.

Barristers are regulated by the Bar Standards Board
(BSB) and are independent practitioners. They are
traditionally organised into chambers, which are
groups of self-employed barristers who share office
space and support staff. A lot of Barristers worked
remotely and continue to do so further to the
lockdowns between 2020-2022. In the UK,
Barristers are also divided into two distinct
branches, the “Bar Council of England and Wales” and
the “Bar of Northern Ireland”.

In order to become a barrister in the United Kingdom,
an individual must first complete a law degree or a
degree in another subject followed by the Common
Professional Examination (CPE) or Graduate Diploma
in Law (GDL). After that, they must then complete
the Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC) and pass
an assessment called the “Bar Vocational Course”.
After completing the BPTC, an individual must secure
a pupillage, which is an apprenticeship with a
practicing barrister or chambers. Once they have
completed the pupillage, they are then able to

practice as a barrister.

In recent years, there has been a move towards
greater integration of the legal profession in the
United Kingdom, with some barristers now working
in solicitors’ firms, and solicitors providing advocacy
services in court. However, the traditional role of
barristers as trial advocates remains an important
part of the legal system.

Barristers have also been responsible for many of
the historic legal cases in United Kingdom, many of
them have become famous for their legal arguments
and have been trailblazers in the legal field. They
have been instrumental in shaping the laws and legal
system of the United Kingdom and continue to be so
till this day.

The United Kingdom has a rich legal history, and
there have been many key cases that have shaped
UK law over the years. Here are a few examples:

Magna Carta (1215): This medieval document is
considered one of the most important legal
documents in history, and it established the
principle that no one, not even the monarch, is
above the law. It also set out basic rights and
protections for individuals, such as the right to a
fair trial.
Bushell’s Case (1670): This case established the
principle of jury independence, and held that jury
members could not be punished for their verdicts,
even if they were not in line with the judge’s
instructions.
Entick v. Carrington (1765): This case dealt with
the principle of habeas corpus, which ensures
35

that people cannot be detained without a valid
reason and that they have the right to be
brought before a court to challenge their
detention.

R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the
European Union (2017): This case challenged the
government’s ability to trigger Article 50 of the
Treaty of the European Union, which started the
process of the United Kingdom leaving the
European Union, without parliamentary
approval. The court held that the government
could not do so without an act of parliament.

These are just a few examples of the many key cases
that have shaped UK law over the years. Many of
these cases have had a significant impact on shaping
the laws and legal system of the United Kingdom and
continue to be studied and referenced in legal
contexts till this day.

In addition to the criminal cases I mentioned earlier,
there have also been many civil cases in UK legal
history that have shaped the law. Here are a few
examples:

Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932): dealt with the
legal principle of negligence in civil law. The
plaintiff, Ms Donoghue, consumed a ginger beer
in a café and found a decomposed snail in the
bottle, she fell ill and claimed against the
manufacturer, Stevenson. It established the
principle of the “neighbourhood principle” that a
manufacturer owe a duty of care to its end
consumer.
White v. Jones (1995): This case dealt with the
principle of economic loss in contract law. The
defendant, Mr. Jones, was an architect who
failed to meet professional standards in
designing a building for the claimant, Mr. White.
As a result, Mr White suffered economic loss due
to the value of the building being lower than it
would have been if the building had been designed
correctly.

Ashworth Hospital Authority v. MGN Ltd (2002):
This case dealt with the principle of privacy in
human rights law.
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the
European Union (2017): This case dealt with the
principle of parliamentary sovereignty in
constitutional law.
R (Miller) v Ministry of Justice (2018): This case
held that the government has a duty to consult
parliament before taking decisions that
significantly affect the rights of UK citizens
under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act
2018.

Oyston v. Times Newspapers Ltd (2018): This case
dealt with the principle of defamation and libel
in media law.

These are just a few examples of the many civil cases
that have shaped UK law over the years. They have
had a significant impact on the laws and legal system
of the United Kingdom and continue to be studied and
referenced in legal contexts till this day.

Can a barrister represent someone they know is
guilty in uk law?

In the United Kingdom, a barrister is allowed to
represent someone they believe is guilty of a crime.
The role of a barrister is to advocate for their client,
regardless of whether they believe their client is
guilty or innocent. It is not the role of the barrister
to make judgments about the guilt or innocence of
their client, but rather to provide the best possible
defense for them within the bounds of the law.
The principle of the “cab-rank rule” applies to
barristers, meaning that once a barrister has agreed
to represent a client, they cannot refuse to
represent them for any reason, except for ethical
considerations. They must defend their client’s case
to the best of their ability, regardless of whether
they personally believe their client is guilty.

Note that the Cab Rank Rule does not apply to direct
access work.

However, this does not mean that barristers are free
to act unethically or to break the law. They are
bound by professional rules of conduct, which are set
by the Bar Standards Board (BSB) and they must not
help or encourage their clients to lie or deceive the
court. They must also not represent a client if they
know that the client’s case is based on perjured
evidence or if they know that the client intends to
use perjured evidence.

It is worth mentioning that, in some cases, a
barrister may be able to offer a plea bargain to the
prosecution, which can result in a lesser charge or a
more lenient sentence for the defendant. This can be
an effective strategy for resolving a case without
going to trial and could be beneficial for the
defendant if they are guilty.

In summary, while a barrister is able to represent
someone they know is guilty, they must do so within
the bounds of professional conduct and the law. They
are bound to defend their client’s case to the best of
their ability, within the limits set by the rules of
conduct and laws.

THE FUTURE

The future of barristers in the United Kingdom is
likely to be influenced by a number of factors,
including changes in technology, the economy, and
societal trends.

Here are a few potential developments that may
shape the role of barristers in the future:

Technological advancements: Technology is likely
to continue to have a significant impact on the
legal profession, and barristers will need to
adapt to new tools and ways of working. For
example, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and
online platforms for legal research and document
management may become more prevalent,
allowing barristers to work more efficiently and
effectively. The metaverse for court hearings
and meetings and use of nfts for membership
may well play a pivotal role in the future,
Alternative business structures: There has been
a growing trend in recent years towards greater
integration of the legal profession, with many
barristers now working in solicitors’ firms and
law firms providing advocacy services in court.
This trend is likely to continue, with the
possibility of more alternative business
structures emerging in the future.
Increased competition: As the legal market
becomes more crowded, competition for clients is
44

likely to increase. Barristers will need to find
ways to differentiate themselves from other
legal practitioners and demonstrate their value
to clients in order to remain successful.

Greater diversity and inclusion: As society
becomes more diverse, the legal profession will
need to reflect this diversity and provide a more
inclusive environment for people from all
backgrounds. This may include efforts to increase
the number of women and individuals from
minority backgrounds among barristers, as well
as greater sensitivity to the needs and concerns
of clients from diverse backgrounds.
Government policies: The government may
implement policies that would impact barristers
in the future, such as changes to legal aid, access
to justice, and court reform can have a big
impact on how barristers work, and therefore it
is important to keep an eye on these policies.

All these points are trends that may impact the
future of barristers in the United Kingdom, but it is
worth noting that the legal field is always evolving
45

and can be impacted by unexpected events as well.
Barristers will need to be adaptable and ready to
respond to changes in order to remain relevant and
successful in the future.

The United Kingdom has had many interesting and
high-profile law cases in the past 10 years, here are
a few examples:

R (on the application of UNISON) v Lord
Chancellor (2017): This case challenged the
government’s introduction of employment
tribunal fees.
R (on the application of Privacy International) v
Investigatory Powers Tribunal (2019) : This case
challenged the UK government’s bulk data
collection powers.
R (on the application of Miller) v Prime Minister
(2019): This case challenged the prorogation of
parliament.

R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of
State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
(2019): This case challenged the UK government’s
decision which had the effect of removing the
right of the Chagos Islanders to return to the
island.

Why do Barristers wear wigs and gowns?

Barristers in the United Kingdom wear wigs and
gowns as a traditional form of dress that dates back
to the 17th and 18th centuries.
The origins of the wig can be traced back to the days
when it was fashionable for men to wear long hair
and wigs, and it was practical to keep the hair out of
their eyes while in court.

Wigs were worn as a symbol of status and
professionalism, and it was also believed that the
wig helped to add gravity and authority to the
barrister’s appearance in court.

The gown worn by barristers is also a traditional
form of dress that dates back to the 18th century. It
is believed to have originated as a way of keeping
warm in the drafty, unheated courtrooms of the
time.

The gown is worn over the barrister’s own clothes
and is made of a thick and heavy material. The
gown’s design and color can vary depending on the
barrister’s level of seniority and their area of
practice.

The traditional costume has been passed down
through centuries and is still worn by barristers in
the United Kingdom in courtrooms till this day. Even
though it is not a requirement by law, barristers
consider it as an important part of their
professional identity and tradition. These garments
are worn as a symbol of the barrister’s status,
professionalism, and the gravity of their work as
advocates in the courts.

The material of KC King’s Counsel (formerly QC’s
Queens Counsel) gowns is silk and when they are
48

appointed the process is refered to as “taking silk”
for that reason. KCs are very experienced and
command greater fees.

King’s Counsel (KC) appointments in the UK are made
by the King on the recommendation of the Lord
Chancellor, who is advised by the Kings Counsel
Appointment Committee. The panel considers
candidates based on their experience, reputation,
and ability in their field of practice. Candidates must
be deemed by the panel to be an “advocate of
outstanding ability.” It is considered a great honour
and is usually a sign of a respected and successful
career as an advocate.

Once a candidate is appointed as a KC, they are
entitled to use the post-nominal letters “KC” after
their name, and are often referred to as “silks” due to
the characteristic silk gowns worn by KCs in court.
They may also be appointed to higher judicial
positions, such as judge or appellate judge, and are
often sought after by clients for their expertise and
experience. The process of appointment is typically
reviewed every few years to ensure that it remains
fair and transparent, and to ensure that the
selection panel is representative of diversity.

Inns of Court

The Inns of Court in London are the professional
associations for barristers in England and Wales. They
have played an important role in the training and
regulation of barristers for centuries. The four Inns of
Court are: Lincoln’s Inn, Inner Temple, Middle Temple, and
Gray’s Inn.

The origins of the Inns of Court can be traced back to the
late 12th and early 13th centuries. At that time, law was
taught by barristers themselves, rather than in
universities, and young men would travel to London to
study with a specific barrister or group of barristers. Over
time, these groups of barristers began to form into
organised societies, known as “inns,” which provided
accommodation and dining facilities for students, as well
as a place for barristers to meet and socialise.

Each of the four Inns of Court developed its own distinct
character and traditions, and they have played an
important role in the legal and political history of England.
For example, Lincoln’s Inn is the oldest of the four inns and
it has produced many prominent figures in law, politics and
public service. Inner Temple and Middle Temple are located
in the same complex, with Inner Temple being known for its
legal heritage and Middle Temple for its literary and
theatrical traditions. Gray’s Inn, is the fourth inn and the
smallest of the four, it is known for its strong commercial
and maritime tradition.

The Inns of Court continue to play an important role in the
training and regulation of barristers in England and Wales,
as well as in the administration of justice. They also
continue to maintain many of their historic traditions and
ceremonies, such as the call to the bar, which marks the
point at which a student becomes a fully-qualified
barrister.

Grays Inn

Gray’s Inn is one of the four Inns of Court in London,
England. It is the fourth oldest of the four inns, and it was
officially established in the late 14th century. Gray’s Inn is
known for its strong commercial and maritime tradition.
Throughout its history, Gray’s Inn has been associated with
many prominent figures in law and politics. For example,
many of the members of the Inn were involved in the
drafting of the Magna Carta and the Bill of Rights. In the
Elizabethan era, Gray’s Inn was a center of legal and
political activity, and many of the leading figures of the
time, such as Francis Bacon and Christopher Hatton, were
members of the Inn.

In the 18th and 19th centuries, Gray’s Inn continued to be
a prominent center of legal education and practice. Many
of the leading legal thinkers of the time, such as William
Blackstone and Jeremy Bentham, were associated with the
Inn. Additionally, Gray’s Inn played an important role in the
development of commercial law, and many of the leading
practitioners in this field were members of the Inn.

Today, Gray’s Inn continues to be an important institution
in the legal profession in England and Wales. It is
responsible for the education and training of barristers,
and it plays an important role in the regulation of the
profession. The Inn also maintains many of its historic
traditions and ceremonies, such as the call to the bar, and
it continues to be a center of legal scholarship and
research.
In terms of its buildings, Gray’s Inn has a mix of
architectural styles and it’s considered one of the most
picturesque of the four Inns of Court. The Hall, built in the
16th century, is one of the most important surviving
examples of Tudor architecture in London. The Chapel, built
in the 17th century, is considered one of the finest
examples of Jacobean architecture in London. The Old
Library, built in the 18th century, is an important example
of Georgian architecture.

In addition to its legal and architectural significance, Gray’s
Inn has a rich cultural and social history. The Inn has long
had a reputation for being a place of intellectual and
artistic excellence, and throughout its history, it has been
home to many notable figures from the worlds of
literature, art, and music.

The Inn has a strong literary tradition and many famous
writers have been associated with Gray’s Inn, including
Christopher Marlowe, Ben Jonson, and John Donne. The Inn
also has a strong theatrical tradition, and many famous
actors and playwrights, such as William Shakespeare and
Richard Burbage, have performed at the Inn’s hall.
Gray’s Inn has also been associated with many notable
figures in the arts and music. For example, the Inn has a
long-standing tradition of choral music, and the Gray’s Inn
56

Choir, which was founded in the 16th century, is one of the
oldest choral groups in the country. The Inn also has a
strong tradition of visual arts, and many famous artists,
such as Joshua Reynolds and Thomas Gainsborough, have
exhibited their work at the Inn.

In summary, Gray’s Inn is not only one of the four Inns of
Court in London, but it is also an important institution in
the legal profession, an architectural gem and a cultural
and social hub. Today, it continues to be a vibrant center of
legal education and research, as well as a place where
members of the legal profession can come together to
socialize and share ideas.

Lincoln’s Inn

Lincoln’s Inn is one of the four Inns of Court in London,
England, and it is the oldest of the four inns. It was

officially established in the late 14th century and has a
rich history and tradition.
Throughout its history, Lincoln’s Inn has been associated
with many prominent figures in law and politics. For
example, many of the members of the Inn were involved in
the drafting of the Magna Carta and the Bill of Rights. In
the Elizabethan era, Lincoln’s Inn was a center of legal and
political activity, and many of the leading figures of the
time, such as Sir Francis Bacon and Sir Thomas More, were
members of the Inn.
In the 18th and 19th centuries, Lincoln’s Inn continued to
be a prominent center of legal education and practice.
Many of the leading legal thinkers of the time, such as
William Blackstone, were associated with the Inn.
Additionally, Lincoln’s Inn played an important role in the
development of constitutional law, and many of the
leading practitioners in this field were members of the Inn.
Today, Lincoln’s Inn is considered one of the most prestigious
of the four Inns of Court, and it continues to be an
important institution in the legal profession in England
and Wales. It is responsible for the education and training
of barristers, and it plays an important role in the
regulation of the profession. The Inn also maintains many
of its historic traditions and ceremonies, such as the call to
the bar, and it continues to be a center of legal scholarship
and research.

In terms of architecture, Lincoln’s Inn is considered one of
the most beautiful of the four Inns of Court. The Inn has a
mix of architectural styles, with the oldest buildings
dating back to the 15th and 16th centuries, and the
newest buildings dating back to the 19th century. The
Great Hall, built in the 16th century, is considered one of
the finest examples of Tudor architecture in London. The
Chapel, built in the 18th century, is an important example
of Georgian architecture. The Old Library, built in the 19th
century, is considered one of the finest examples of
Victorian Gothic architecture.

Overall, Lincoln’s Inn is a remarkable institution with a
rich history and tradition that continues to play a central
role in the legal profession in England and Wales. It is not
only a legal institution, but also an architectural treasure
and a cultural hub.

In addition to its legal and architectural significance,
Lincoln’s Inn has a rich cultural and social history. The Inn
has long had a reputation for being a place of intellectual
and artistic excellence, and throughout its history, it has
60

been home to many notable figures from the worlds of
literature, art, and music.

The Inn has a strong literary tradition, with many famous
writers having been associated with Lincoln’s Inn, including
John Donne, John Dryden, and Samuel Johnson. The Inn also
has a strong theatrical tradition, and many famous actors
and playwrights, such as David Garrick and Samuel Foote,
have performed at the Inn’s hall.

Lincoln’s Inn is also associated with many notable figures in

the arts and music. For example, the Inn has a long-
standing tradition of choral music, and the Lincoln’s Inn

In summary, Lincoln’s Inn is not only the oldest of the four
Inns of Court in London, but it is also an important
institution in the legal profession, an architectural
treasure, and a cultural and social hub. Today, it continues
to be a vibrant center of legal education and research, as
well as a place where members of the legal profession can
come together to socialize and share ideas. It has produced
61

many prominent figures in law, politics, and public service
and continues to be a respected institution in the legal
field.

Inner Temple

The Inner Temple is one of the four Inns of Court in London,
England. It is located in the same complex as the Middle
Temple, and together they are known as the “Temple Inns.”
The Inner Temple was officially established in the late 14th
century and has a rich history and tradition.
Throughout its history, the Inner Temple has been
associated with many prominent figures in law and
politics. For example, many of the members of the Inn were
involved in the drafting of the Magna Carta and the Bill of
Rights. In the Elizabethan era, the Inner Temple was a
center of legal and political activity, and many of the
leading figures of the time, such as Sir Francis Bacon and Sir
Walter Raleigh, were members of the Inn.
In the 18th and 19th centuries, the Inner Temple continued
to be a prominent center of legal education and practice.
Many of the leading legal thinkers of the time, such as
William Blackstone, were associated with the Inn.

Additionally, the Inner Temple played an important role in
the development of common law, and many of the leading
practitioners in this field were members of the Inn.

Today, the Inner Temple is considered one of the most
prestigious of the four Inns of Court, and it continues to be
an important institution in the legal profession in England
and Wales. It is responsible for the education and training
of barristers, and it plays an important role in the
regulation of the profession. The Inn also maintains many
of its historic traditions and ceremonies, such as the call to
the bar, and it continues to be a center of legal scholarship
and research.

In terms of architecture, the Inner Temple is considered one
of the most picturesque of the four Inns of Court. The Inn
has a mix of architectural styles, with the oldest buildings
dating back to the 15th and 16th centuries, and the
newest buildings dating back to the 19th century. The Hall,
built in the 16th century, is considered one of the finest
examples of Tudor architecture in London. The Chapel, built
in the 17th century, is an important example of Jacobean
architecture. The Library, built in the 19th century, is
considered one of the finest examples of Victorian Gothic
architecture.

Overall, the Inner Temple is a remarkable institution with
a rich history and tradition that continues to play a
central role in the legal profession in England and Wales. It
is not only a legal institution, but also an architectural
treasure and a cultural and social hub. Today, it continues
to be a vibrant center of legal education and research, as
well as a place where members of the legal profession can
come together to socialize and share ideas.

In addition to its legal and architectural significance, the
Inner Temple has a rich cultural and social history. The Inn
has long had a reputation for being a place of intellectual
and artistic excellence, and throughout its history, it has
been home to many notable figures from the worlds of
literature, art, and music.

The Inn has a strong literary tradition, with many famous
writers having been associated with the Inner Temple,
including William Shakespeare, Ben Jonson, and John
Dryden. The Inn also has a strong theatrical tradition, and
many famous actors and playwrights, such as David
Garrick and Samuel Foote, have performed at the Inn’s hall.
The Inner Temple is also associated with many notable
figures in the arts and music. For example, the Inn has a
long-standing tradition of choral music, and the Inner
Temple Choir, which was founded in the 16th century, is one
of the oldest choral groups in the country. The Inn also has
a strong tradition of visual arts, and many famous artists,
such as Joshua Reynolds and Thomas Gainsborough, have
exhibited their work at the Inn.

In summary, The Inner Temple is one of the four Inns of
Court in London, and it is known for its legal heritage. It is
considered one of the most prestigious of the four Inns of
Court, and it continues to be an important institution in
the legal profession in England and Wales. It is responsible
for the education and training of barristers, and it plays
an important role in the regulation of the profession. The
Inn also maintains many of its historic traditions and
ceremonies, such as the call to the bar, and it continues to
be a center of legal scholarship and research. It is not only
a legal institution, but also an architectural treasure and
a cultural and social hub. Today, it continues to be a vibrant
center of legal education and research, as well as a place
where members of the legal profession can come together
to socialize and share ideas.

Middle Temple

The Middle Temple is one of the four Inns of Court in
London, England. It is located in the same complex as the
66

Inner Temple, and together they are known as the “Temple
Inns.” The Middle Temple was officially established in the
late 14th century and has a rich history and tradition.
Throughout its history, the Middle Temple has been
associated with many prominent figures in law and
politics. For example, many of the members of the Inn were
involved in the drafting of the Magna Carta and the Bill of
Rights. In the Elizabethan era, the Middle Temple was a
center of legal and political activity, and many of the
leading figures of the time, such as Sir Francis Bacon and Sir
Walter Raleigh, were members of the Inn.

In the 18th and 19th centuries, the Middle Temple
continued to be a prominent center of legal education and
practice. Many of the leading legal thinkers of the time,
such as William Blackstone, were associated with the Inn.
Additionally, the Middle Temple played an important role in
the development of common law, and many of the leading
practitioners in this field were members of the Inn.

Today, the Middle Temple is considered one of the most
prestigious of the four Inns of Court, and it continues to be
an important institution in the legal profession in England
and Wales. It is responsible for the education and training
of barristers, and it plays an important role in the
regulation of the profession. The Inn also maintains many
of its historic traditions and ceremonies, such as the call to
the bar, and it continues to be a center of legal scholarship
and research.

In terms of architecture, the Middle Temple is considered
one of the most picturesque of the four Inns of Court. The
Inn has a mix of architectural styles, with the oldest
buildings dating back to the 15th and 16th centuries, and
the newest buildings dating back to the 19th century. The
Hall, built in the 16th century, is considered one of the
finest examples of Tudor architecture in London. The Chapel,
built in the 17th century, is an important example of
Jacobean architecture. The Library, built in the 19th
century, is considered one of the finest examples of
Victorian Gothic architecture.

Overall, The Middle Temple is a remarkable institution
with a rich history and tradition that continues to play a
central role in the legal profession in England and Wales. It
is not only a legal institution, but also an architectural
treasure and a cultural and social hub. Today, it continues
to be a vibrant center of legal education and research, as
well as a place where members of the legal profession can
come together to socialize and share ideas. It is known for
its literary and theatrical traditions and continues to be a
respected institution in the legal field.

In addition to its legal and architectural significance, the
Middle Temple has a rich cultural and social history. The Inn
has long had a reputation for being a place of intellectual
and artistic excellence, and throughout its history, it has
68

been home to many notable figures from the worlds of
literature, art, and music.

The Inn has a strong literary tradition, with many famous
writers having been associated with the Middle Temple,
including William Shakespeare, Ben Jonson, and John
Dryden. The Inn also has a strong theatrical tradition, and
many famous actors and playwrights, such as David
Garrick and Samuel Foote, have performed at the Inn’s hall.

The Middle Temple is also associated with many notable
figures in the arts and music. For example, the Inn has a
long-standing tradition of choral music, and the Middle
Temple Choir, which was founded in the 16th century, is one
of the oldest choral groups in the country. The Inn also has
a strong tradition of visual arts, and many famous artists,
such as Joshua Reynolds and Thomas Gainsborough, have
exhibited their work at the Inn.

In summary, The Middle Temple is one of the four Inns of
Court in London, and it is known for its literary and
theatrical traditions. It is considered one of the most
prestigious of the four Inns of Court, and it continues to be
an important institution in the legal profession in England
and Wales. It is responsible for the education and training
of barristers, and it plays an important role in the
regulation of the profession. The Inn also maintains many
of its historic traditions and ceremonies, such as the call to
the bar, and it continues to be a center of legal scholarship
and research. It is not only a legal institution, but also an
architectural treasure and a cultural and social hub. Today,
it continues to be a vibrant center of legal education and
research, as well as a place where members of the legal
profession can come together to socialise.

What is the difference between Civil and Criminal Barristers in the
UK?

In the UK, barristers are divided into two main branches: criminal
barristers and civil barristers. Criminal barristers specialise in
defending and prosecuting criminal cases, while civil barristers
specialise in non-criminal cases, such as commercial disputes,
personal injury claims, and housing disputes. Civil barristers may
also advise clients on their legal rights and obligations, draft legal
documents, and represent clients in negotiations and mediations.
They typically have different skills and expertise, and work in
different areas of the legal system.

Additionally, criminal barristers typically work in the Crown Court
and in the higher courts, where they represent defendants and
prosecute cases on behalf of the Crown Prosecution Service. They
also work in the magistrates’ court. Civil barristers, on the other
hand, typically work in the County Court, the High Court, Court of
Appeal and Supreme Court where they represent clients in disputes
over money, property, and other civil matters. Note that Criminal
matters may also be heard in the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court
on appeal.

Another distinction between criminal and civil barristers is the
way in which they are paid. Criminal barristers are typically paid by
the government, through legal aid, whereas civil barristers are
typically paid by their clients.

In summary, Criminal barristers are those who practice criminal law
in the UK, representing clients in criminal trials and providing legal
advice on criminal matters. Civil barristers, on the other hand,
practice civil law, which includes areas such as family law, personal
injury claims, commercial disputes, and housing disputes. Both types
of barristers must have completed the same training and passed the
same qualifications, but they typically have different skills and
expertise and work in different areas of the legal system.

Conclusion

Practice at the Bar has evolved extensively, generally and
particularly more recently due to the covid lockdowns,
video and telephone hearings increased and one can find
court hearings filmed from both the Supreme and Court of
Appeal on YouTube.

Direct Access scheme has been part of the evolution and
has arguably given many more people access to justice.

Featured Direct Access Barrister Profile

“Montclare is an excellent Barrister…” – North Ford
Solicitors

Montclare Campbell LL.B Law First Class Honours,
Barrister, Oxford University Matriculant Call, 2011
[email protected] 07404 588 660
www.MontclareCampbell.co.uk

Montclare Campbell is a Civil Barrister who has
appeared in hundreds of cases in most of the courts
across the United Kingdom including the UK Court of
Appeal where he was successful in the 2022 case of
Bourous v London Borough of Islington [2022] EWCA
Civ 1242 which was also filmed and the video is on
the Court of Appeal YouTube website.

Recommendations

Comments from instructing solicitors include:
“Montclare provided a great service, dealing well with clients and
giving excellent advice.”
“Montclare was instructed to attend Court in a straight forward,
simple matter which he still dealt with in a very professional and
efficient manner. When in discussion with Montclare he was always
very polite and was also very quick in returning calls and reporting
the outcome of the trial. I would recommend Montclare to
colleagues.”
“Thats great news, thank you for your services in this matter.”
“Many thanks for this speedy work” (Solicitor comments regarding
written work)
“That’s wonderful. Many thanks Monty.”
“Stellar effort! Very pleased with the outcome.”
“Many thanks for representing the client at today’s hearing. I can
confirm that the client was very happy with your expertise and
competence.”
“Thank You, Montclare looks like you did a fine job……..”

Why choose Montclare as your barrister?

Intellectual heavyweight and commercially focused – Having
graduated with a first class honours degree in law, he is down to
earth and personable and takes a practical and commercial approach
to legal problems.

The big picture – He has experience of dealing with cases from initial
instruction, drafting pleadings to final hearing so is well versed to
dealing with matters requiring a Public Access Barrister.

Montclare has appeared in court on behalf of both Claimants and
Defendants, assisting with recovery of damages / debts and dealing
with breach of contract claims.

Prior to coming to the Bar Montclare had extensive experience in
the legal profession having provided legal advice to over 800
businesses, whilst seconded to a FTSE AIM listed PLC. He has
experience taking matters from initial instruction to final instance
and/or settlement, having worked in various capacities in a variety
of law firms and can foresee how to avoid potential obstacles well in
advance due to this insight.

CASES

Employment Law

Jideofo v Doves Solicitors UKET/2331581/2008/E:
3 Day Hearing. Argued successfully that claimant was not an
employee or owed all wages claimed and saved client £145,000 in
compensation.

Syl-Turay v Imperial College Healthcare Trust UKET/3302609/2009:
Successful in arguing that appropriate steps had not been taken to
ensure that claimant client was redeployed.

Aremu v Kings College NHS Foundation Trust UKET/2303722/2009
Convinced tribunal that client had the basis of a case for a claim
under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998.

Aziz v Mays Nurses Care Agency UKET/2340025/2009
Triumphant in defending client against a claim for £4322.50 under
the Minimum Wage Act 1998.

Commercial Law
T v S [2015] Commercial Law
Montclare recovered damages for breach of contract on behalf of
his multi-million pound turnover client.

O v H [2015] Commercial Law
Montclare obtained approval of a consent order in favour of his
client for damages, costs and interest.

O v A [2012] Willesden County Court
Montclare recovered debt and fixed costs on behalf of major utility
company.

B v E [2014] Commercial Law
Montclare secured a judgment for his Claimant client, dismissal of
the counterclaim and interest at the rate of 8% plus costs at total
sum to be paid of just under £5000.

F v N [2014] Multi-Track Trial
Montclare Instructed to appear at the handing down of judgment
and to request written submissions on quantum which was sought at
over £110000.

S v A [2014] Commercial Law
Montclare represented a national estate agency company and
recovered their fee claimed at just under £4000 plus interest and
costs.

M v F [2013] Mortgage
Montclare obtained a judgment for his building society client in the
sum of circa £60,000.

P v B [2013] Commercial Law
Montclare recovered all damages claimed plus costs in a breach of
contract matter for his client, an archeological company.

S v I [2013] Commercial Law
Montclare successfully recovered the remainder from an overall
£5000 judgment plus costs on behalf of his company client in
relation to a commercial dispute.
T v C [2013] Commercial Dispute
Montclare successfully acted for an International Publishing
company in relation to recovery of its fees for referrals. He obtained
an order for the full damages claimed and costs.

I v A [2012]
Acting for a confectionary company in relation to the breach of a
lease agreement for a confectionary machine. Montclare
successfully applied for rejection of the Defendant’s application to
set aside judgment and obtained costs and further interest.

H v P [2012] Commercial Law
Montclare’s submissions resulted in the strike out of the Defendant’s
application, obtaining summarily assessed costs, in relation to a
breach of contract matter for a Recruitment Company client.

B v S [2012]

Montclare dealt with directions hearing for major utility client.

G v D [2012] Commercial Law
Montclare recovered a figure of just under £4500 in respect of
damages and costs in a commercial dispute for his client, a
construction supplies company.

B v Z [2012] Breach of Contract
Montclare recovered over £3000 for breach of contract plus fixed
costs and his fee for the other parties unreasonable conduct.

H v S [2012] Charging order
Montclare obtained Final charging order to continue unmodified as
same sum in interim charging order plus fixed costs and
disbursements.

Insolvency Law
Re S [2014] Insolvency Law
Montclare secured an order which allowed his client enough time to
file an Insolvency Act 1986 Section 363 Application. Over £100,000
at stake.

H v G [2013] Chancery Division High Court (Company Winding up)
Montclare obtained an adjournment of a winding up petition on
behalf of his company client as per agreement with the petitioner.

G v P [2012]
Montclare pursuaded the court to make a Bankruptcy order against
a debtor on behalf of his client company.

Re H [2012]

Montclare pursuaded the court to make Bankruptcy orders against 2
debtors.

Re E [2012] Insolvency Law : Chancery Division High Court (Winding
up of Limited Company)
Montclare made an application for dismissal of a winding up
petition, which was successful the other side having consented to
the application.

H v C [2012] Insolvency Law : Chancery Division High Court
(Winding up of Limited Company)
Acting for liquidator, Montclare made a successful application for
the winding up petition to be withdrawn and the costs of the
petition to be in the liquidation.

H v B [2012] Insolvency Law: (Bankruptcy)
Acting for the Trustee in Bankruptcy Montclare made a successful
application for the court to make an order in the same terms
submitted by his instructors.

Construction Law
F v C [2015] Construction Law
Montclare recovered just under £20000 damages and full costs
claimed of £4951.60. Exceptionally here he also recovered damages
for stress and inconvenience totalling just under £5000.

N v S [2012] Construction Law
Acting for a Claimant Montclare got the Defendant builder’s
application to set aside dismissed and an Interim charging order made
final plus costs.

Costs
R v S [2013] Costs
Montclare obtained a 50% reduction claimed against his client in a
costs assessment, costs claimed having been reduced from circa
£2000 to circa £1000.

G v C [2012] Costs
Montclare was instructed to deal with detailed assessment hearing
in relation to costs of over £20,000.

S v T [2012] Costs
Montclare secured an interim costs payment of £6000 in relation to
ongoing detailed assessment proceedings.

Credit Hire /Repair
E v Q [2015] Credit Hire
Montclare recovered a daily rate of £210 plus vat , whereas the
Defendant had contended for a rate of £100 per day, representing a
110% increase over the rate the Defendant argued applied.

T v S [2015] Credit Hire
Montclare recovered full period claimed of 30 days, subject to the
court’s decision on liability.

S v H [2014] RTA/Credit Hire
Montclare recovered compensation for his client whose vehicle was
damaged by a lorry.

A v L [2014] Credit Hire
Acting for his Defendant client Montclare persuaded the court to
reduce the period claimed from 17 days to 5 days and to dismiss the
85

claim for a collection and delivery charge. The outcome was that his
client’s offer was more than the court awarded and as a result
Montclare was able to recover costs for his client. The court
awarded just under £500 and the Defendant’s offer was circa
£1800. It amounted to a significant saving for his client of at least
300%.

W v J [2014] Credit Hire
Montclare achieved a judgment for his client where the period
claimed was reduced by only one day to 29 days and recovered circa
80% of the rate claimed.

F v S [2014] Credit Hire
Montclare secured a period for his client of 18 days compared to the
20 days claimed and a figure of just under £100 daily rate

O v E [2013] Credit Hire
Montclare recovered the full period claimed of 57 days, full
collection and delivery charge and fixed costs.

L v S [2013] Credit Hire
Montclare established that his client was impecunious and recovered
sum for hire plus costs.

M v J [2012]
Acting for a Defendant, Montclare negotiated and secured a
settlement of liability and quantum on a credit hire matter at the
door of the court.

I v B [2012] Credit Repair matter

Judge: “ waiting for 2 hours could have struck out but have not due
to your (Montclare’s) persuasive advocacy”. The Judge also gave
judgment for Montclare’s client in respect of liability.

M v K [2012]
Montclare recovered 83% of the period claimed in a credit hire
claim, plus delivery charge and a favourable judgment on liability.

I v B [2012] Credit Hire and Repair
Montclare recovered his fee due to the unreasonable conduct of the
other party, over £2500 (which included the full hire period) in
respect of the heads of claim, witness expenses and fixed costs.

M v M [2012] Credit hire
Montclare recovered all Credit Hire claimed of just under £4000.

Landlord and Tenant

L v B [2013] Landlord and Tenant
Montclare recovered outstanding service charges and costs for his
London Local Government client.

L v A [2013] Landlord and Tenant (Service Charges)
Montclare recovered outstanding service charges plus interest and
costs for his local government client.

P v L [2013] Landlord and Tenant
Montclare obtained an order for possession and arrears for his
landlord client.

L v D [2013] Central London County Court: Landlord and Tenant
Dispute
Montclare dealt with the interpretation of a Transfer Deed
Covenant on behalf of a major London Local Government client. This
involved extensive submissions and analysis of local plans.

L v D [2013] Service Charge Arrears
Montclare recovered the above for his Local Government client in
addition to interest and costs.

M v S and C [2012]
Montclare acted for a Landlord in a Case Management Conference
where the matter was allocated to the fast track and secured
directions requiring the Defendants to properly plead their case.

K v M [2012] Landlord and Tenant
Acting for a property investment company Montclare obtained an
order for possession and judgment of over £5000 with fixed costs,
and daily occupation rate confirmed.

L v D [2012] Leasehold Service Charges
Montclare obtained a judgment plus interest for the full services
charges claimed on behalf of his London Borough Client.

T v B [2012] Landlord and Tenant (Forfeiture)
Montclare obtained a forfeiture order on behalf of his Landlord
client giving submissions on Smith v Spaul [2002] EWCA Civ 1830,
meeting the judge’s query in relation to such an order when there
was a mortgagee in possession who had not been joined as
Defendant. The answer being that contract law applies and there is
88

no privity with mortgagee in possession and no need to add as a
defendant. Montclare obtained an order for costs of just under
£3000.

L v L [2012]
Montclare acted for a local authority to recover missed payments.

L v W [2012] Landlord and Tenant (Service Charges)
Montclare obtained a judgment for recovery of services charges plus
interest, the interest aspect having been challenged, on behalf of
his London Local Authority client.

? *Cases anonymised where required to protect confidentiality

This book is for entertainment purposes only. This
publication is designed to provide accurate and
authoritative information in regard to the subject
matter covered. It is sold with the understanding
that neither the author nor the publisher is engaged
in rendering legal, investment, accounting or other
professional services. While the publisher and
author have used their best efforts in preparing this
book, they make no representations or warranties
with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the
contents of this book and specifically disclaim any
implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for
a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or
extended by sales representatives or written sales
materials. The advice and strategies contained
herein may not be suitable for your situation. You
90

should consult with a professional when appropriate.
Neither the publisher nor the author shall be liable
for any loss of profit or any other commercial
damages, including but not limited to special,
incidental, consequential, personal, or other
damages.Publisher | Copyright Holder Modavis
Consultancy Ltd

The moral rights of the Author have been asserted.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication
including illustrations & pictures, may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any
form or by any means, without the prior permission
in writing of Modavis Consultancy Limited, or as
expressly permitted by law, by license, or under
terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction
rights organisation.
You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any
acquirer.

For legal advice and representation by a Direct
Access Barrister at court ring 0207 867 3744 and
go to www.BarristerLondon.co.uk

Publisher Modavis Consultancy Ltd
@BarristerLondon Instagram
0207 867 3744

wwww.BarristerLondon.co.uk

www.directaccessbarrister.org.uk

Twitter: @BarristerLondn

Go to
www.linktr.ee/BarristerLondon
for social media and professional links